The Indonesian Anti Discrimination Movement (Gerakan Perjuangan Anti Diskriminasi-GANDI)

Chinese Indonesians ten years after reformasi PDF Print E-mail
Written by Inside Indonesia   
Thursday, 28 May 2009 15:34

Chinese Indonesians reflect on their place in the new Indonesia

Since Reformasi, Indonesia's ethnic Chinese community has experienced dramatic change in their relationships with the state and with other Indonesians. As the contributions to this edition suggest, this change has deeply affected the way Chinese Indonesians think and feel about themselves, their history and their place in the Indonesian nation – and indeed the world.

Jemma Purdey’s article ‘A common destiny ’ sets the scene for a journey through the tumult of the last ten years and its implications for Indonesia’s Chinese community. It is the first of five articles that examine the fluid political millieu in which Chinese Indonesians continue to struggle to create a space for themselves as individuals and as a community. As Wahyu Effendi points out, despite legislative reform Chinese Indonesians are too often required to provide proof of citizenship. His point that Chinese Indonesians are never considered to be Indonesian enough is taken up by Christianto Wibisono and Christine Tjhin , who weigh up the challenges of political participation in a context where Chinese Indonesians have yet to be accorded full equality. Finally, Damai Sukmana – a refugee now resident in the United States – reflects on the ongoing trauma and legal problems faced by asylum seekers who chose not to stay in Indonesia after the anti-Chinese violence of 1998.

The theme of trauma is taken up by Yeng-ling Tsai , Juliana Wijaya and Monika Swasti Winarta , who explore the Chinese community’s attempts to come to terms with the past. Monika’s commentary on the hauntingly beautiful photographs of Glodok taken by Paul Kadarisman in the aftermath of the May riots reminds us of the deep scars of this most recent wave of violence. Juliana’s moving tale of the commemoration of the violence of an earlier time in Banyuwangi and Yeng-ling’s evocative description of Medan’s Teochiu Huikuan building and its sinister past provide us with a sense of the longevity of persecution experienced by the Chinese community. Importantly, Juliana and Yeng-ling also send a message of hope, speaking as they do of the community’s efforts to draw strength from its fallen heroes and to reclaim a happier past.

Chinese Indonesians’ attempts to reinvent themselves and establish a new place in Indonesian society has led not only to increased political engagement and more open discussions of former oppressions, but also to a blossoming of cultural expression. Aimee Dawis reminds us that many individuals successfully negotiated the barriers put before the Chinese community in Suharto’s Indonesia. There is no doubt that those barriers are now far less daunting than they were a decade ago. A key aspect of the new openness pertains to religious and cultural expression. The incorporation of Chinese rituals such as the lion dance into official life in Indonesia and the celebration of Imlek, described by CY Hoon , demonstrates a truly remarkable shift in official attitudes – and as Anne Dickson and Juliette Koning note, it is far easier now for Chinese Muslims and Christians to celebrate their religious identity. At the same time, however, members of the Chinese community remain tentative about these new opportunities, fearing that too exuberant a response may prompt a return to the past. This tension between fear and optimism is a creative one, which as Charlotte Setijadi-Dunn explains, has produced a rich array of cinematic explorations of what it means to be Chinese in Indonesia.

This edition seeks to help document the transformation of this community, which as Wahyu Effendi reminds us, is as much about the maturing of Indonesia as a nation as about the Chinese Indonesians themselves.

Michele Ford  ( This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ) researches Indonesian social movements at the University of Sydney, where she chairs the Department of Indonesian Studies.
Jemma Purdey ( This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ) is an ARC postdoctoral fellow based at Monash University’s Centre for Southeast Asian Studies.

Source : Inside Indonesia 95: Jan-Mar 2009
Last Updated on Wednesday, 22 July 2009 16:31
 

Polling

Apakah UU Kerukunan Umat Beragama diperlukan?
 

Books

  • Kewarganegaraan Indonesia

     

     

     

     

     

    Product : buku7 | Buku Kewarganegaraan Indoensia | Price/Unit : 50.00 IDR
    PEMBAHARUAN KEWARGANEGARAAN RI 
    DALAM kolom sorotan (Kompas, 18/2), Satya Arinanto menjelaskan, pokok pikiran yang membandingkan antara draf Rancangan Undang-Undang (RUU) Kewarganegaraan RI Departemen Kehakiman dan HAM dengan draf Panitia Kerja Pengkajian Diskriminasi (GANDI) dan Forum Komunikasi Kesatuan Bangsa (FKKB).Dalam kesempatan ini, penulis ingin menanggapi tulisan itu dan menjelaskan secara garis besar pokok-pokok pikiran dari draf RUU Kewarganegaraan yang telah disampaikan kepada Badan Legislasi DPR tanggal 14 Februari 2002.Beberapa pokok pikiran yang kami kemukakan, sebenarnya merupakan koreksi kritis atas Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 62 Tahun 1958 sekaligus Rancangan UU (RUU) Kewarganegaraan RI Departemen Kehakiman dan HAM, yang meliputi prioritas penggunaan asas kewarganegaraan, status kewarganegaraan RI, hak dan kewajiban warga negara, kesetaraan status hukum warga negara perempuan dan pria, pembuktian kewarganegaraan RI, dan beberapa pemikiran tentang hak asasi manusia dan aspek tranparansi dalam penyelenggaraan kewarganegaraan RI.Warga negara secara kolektif merupakan salah satu fundamen penting keberadaan suatu negara, sehingga sudah selayaknya mendapat kepastian dan jaminan hukum yang layak dari negara. Seorang warga negara Indonesia harus mendapat jaminan perlindungan dan kepastian hukum atas hak-hak yang dimiliki, sekaligus kewajiban-kewajiban yang menjadi tanggung jawabnya sebagai warga negara dari suatu negara. Setiap warga negara harus memiliki suatu jaminan kepastian hukum yang dapat membedakan seorang warga negara dengan penduduk atau warga negara dari negara lain di negara RI.Meski sebenarnya merupakan ikhtisar UUD 1945 dan peraturan perundangan terkait, setidaknya pokok pikiran inilah yang mendasari panitia kerja (Panja) untuk memberikan dasar hukum yang layak bagi pengaturan Hak dan Kewajiban Negara dalam RUU Kewarganegaraan yang diajukan. Sehingga secara sistematika, suatu undang-undang Kewarganegaraan RI akan mampu menjawab siapa dan apa konsekuensinya (hak dan kewajiban) bila menjadi warga negara. (Kompas,13 Maret 2002)

  • cover Tionghoa Dalam Cengkeraman SBKRI

    Product : buku5 | TIonghoa Dalam Cengkeraman SBKRI | Price/Unit : 28,000.00 IDR
    NEVER INDONESIAN ENOUGH 
    Unlike Indonesians of Arab or Indian descent, Chinese Indonesians are required to have a document that proves they are Indonesian citizens. Whenever Chinese Indonesians deal with the bureaucracy, they are obliged to produce this document. It is an integral part of their administrative experiences of birth, marriage and death. They need it to get an identity card, to enrol in an educational institution, to obtain a business license and to get a passport.Known by the acronym SBKRI, this document is compulsory for all Chinese Indonesians of 21 years of age or over, even if they were born in Indonesia to parents who were already Indonesian citizens. There is no equivalent document for other Indonesians, who simply have to show their identity card and their birth certificate. In practice, the SBKRI is a mark of ethnicity – for which Chinese must pay dearly – that passes down through the generations without end.Cultural violence.(Inside Indonesia 95,Jan-Mar 2009)

Shopping Cart

Your cart is empty